1.
IntroductionFora long time now, there has been an argument on nature versus nurture in thedevelopment of human, which is the one of the biggest problems in DevelopmentPsychology. Some people argue that inherited genes have an enormous impact onhuman development. For example, kid’s stature, eye shading, and facialappearance are generally controlled by genetic factors. As Rothbart, Ahadi, andEvans (2000) and D. C.Rowe, Almeida, and Jacobson (1999) says, “Children’stemperament – their characteristic ways of responding to emotional events,novel stimuli, and their own impulses – seems to be in part affected by their individual genetic make-up”Nonetheless there are those who claim that we are effected by our environmentsuch as cultural experiences, social interactions with other people, etc.Clearly, support influences youngsters’ advancement through various channels:physically through sustenance, exercises, and stress; mentally through casualencounters and formal guidelines; and socially through grown-up good examplesand companion connections. Therefore, there has always been a continuingcontroversy whether innate or environment gains a more dominant influence onindividual growth.
However the role of heredity and nurture must bereconsidered in light of the Human Genome Project’s surprised results.According to result of the Human Genome Project, “Since 95% of the populationpossess “fit” genes, dysfunctions in this population are attributable toenvironmental influences (nurture)”. Therefore, this paper, with the purpose ofsharing three key points to explain why human improvement depends essentiallyon ecological variables, not hereditary elements.1. Discussionof findings 2.1.Background information aboutnature and nurtureBeforethis issue can be fully discussed, it is necessary to understand what natureand nurture actually are.
The definition of nature derives from the genetic inheritance or the geneticmake-up, which a person inherits from both parents at the time of conceptionand carries it throughout life (Stephanie Mojica,2017). As Kail, and Cavanaugh(2013) said that “nature is concerned with traits that are geneticallyinherited”. There are many things in an individual, which are heredity factorssuch as sex, shade of eyes, hair and skin, hazards for specific infections,tallness and different qualities. On the other hand, in a 2017 article “How donature and nurture influence human development”, Stephanie Mojica claims that “nurture can be defined as the different environmentalfactors to which person is subjected from birth to death”. Obviously,environmental elements include a host of dimensions. They involve both physicalenvironments and social environments. For instance, an individual has to sufferfrom and expose to not just pressure from their friends but also parental idealsor preconception of society.
2.2.Heredity dimension depends onenvironmental factors Itis essential to realize that nature as the form of inherited traits does existbut in general, an individual’s behavior is effected significantly by nurtureor upbringing. In the past years, “genetics were able to persuade mostpsychologists that genetic traits plays an effective role in influencingintelligence” (Plomin and Defries, 1998). Nevertheless, “a high degree ofheredity does not mean that the environment has no influence on the developmentof any trait” (Neisser et al, 1995). The heredity characteristics are notalways evidently expressed at birth. Many physical features are revealed whenpeople go through the process of “maturation”- the term used by T.M McDevittJ.
E.Ormrod. According to his study, through the course of development, nature elements are just improved completely.For example, traits such as weight can be inherited, but it can also beenhanced by the exterior conditions –surrounding environment.
Another trait is height which is “an inherited trait,but it has increased in recent generations in the United States” (Sternberg, 1996).According to this study, environmental supports such as food, reasonably safeand toxin-free surroundings, and responsive care from others, which are necessaryfor maturation to occur; inherited traits never works alone. Many recent surveys carried out on the infantand children behavior have shown that there is significant evidence to supportthe fact that environmental factors strongly impact human development,especially in the early years. In today’s world, almost all parents encouragetheir kids to participate in some supplemental activities such as learningmusic, dancing, and sports in order toenhance and develop talents or interests of kids. Probably, those talents havebeen given by nature, but they can only be developed into fluent skills whenthey have experienced the severe work of environment elements.
Hence, in thearticle “Myths, Countermyths, and truth about intelligence”, Sternberg statesthat “intelligence could be partially or even highly heritable and, at the sametime, partially or even modifiable” (Sternbeg, p.14). Moreover, in other words,nature’s partner is nurture – theenvironmental conditions. “Nature and nurture are partners also in thetransactions between the gene and the variety of internal environments thatsurround it within the body (Greenough, 1991; Greenough and Black, 1992).
Sincethen, it is timed to reconsider about both terms of nature and nurture that they are inseparableand complementary to each other. Especially, it is not nature versus nurture,it is rather nature through nurture.2.3.Environmental factors have amore dominant influence on peopleUndoubtedly,nurture plays a really massive role in early human development.
Nurture inseveral methods or another encourage individual’s competence to learn and studynew things. There is the common proverb that ” practice makes perfect”. Hence,a person can pick up knowledge by exercising to adapt to all or any creationsin these circumstances or conditions. The section that nurture plays in humandevelopment has been proved by psychologists in experiments where steppingobserve was administered to a cohort of presumption for a few minutesrepeatedly during a day. These youngsters were able to walk many days earlierthan some infants who had not been stepped exercise.(Zalazo, Zelazo andKolb,1972). Everyone was born with a detailed set of potential, however if notput in the right situation, those potentials can never flourish.
This will,then, hinder human development. Inherited factors do not guarantee a person’ progressiveprocess. Environments factors, on the opposite aspect of the argument, shapewho someone is, how people work together with others, and how they behave. JohnWatson, who established the Psychological School of Behaviorism, emphasizedthat despite a child’s inherent potentials, people will be able to be conditionedand trained to become anyone, which is not requires a specific a set ofexperiences. Because that development is influenced and stimulated by theatmosphere they live in.Obviously,it is evident that genetic factors is responsible for manufacturing healthy,well-developed babies. It is also environmental elements that play a pivotalrole within early stages of human development.
Analysis has ended certainlythat early human development is faster because environment conditions areformed on the competence provided byinherited. Moreover genetic elements are responsible for the conventionaldevelopment of the craniate into a standard and healthy baby, but it cannotentirely develop that craniate into an intelligent, knowledgeable or athletic adult.This can be potential solely through the exposure that nurture providessomeone. Thus, it would be correct to mention that even though the characterhas a point of influence, nurture powerfully influences early humandevelopment.
