Introduction according to the canonical arrangement. The book


The purpose of this essay is to deal with a
critical exegesis of the book of Hosea chapter 3:1-5. A brief authorship and
background of the book this book will be given.  Hosea is one of books among the twelve minor
prophets according to the canonical arrangement. The book is accredited to Hosea
‘son of Beeri’ as the author (1:1). There is no evidence about “the prophet’s
life, where he was born, what his occupation was before he was called to be a
prophet, or his age when he became a prophet”.1
The book is well ‘known not for the intense poetic imagery within its oracles,
but for the prophet’s marriage to the adulterous woman Gomer’.2

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now



To understand the message behind the book of Hosea,
one has to understand the time he lived and prophesied. There is no supporting
evidence when the book was written but there is are ‘various scholarly views’.3
Hosea’s ministry was to Israel during “the reign of Uzziah in Judah 792-740 BC, and
king Jeroboam II in Israel 793-753 BC, extending at least thirty years into the reign of Hezekiah 716-686 BC”.4
His  prophecies was to ‘the northern kingdom,
this can be seen by his geographical knowledge of Israel’s, this suggests that
he was likely a citizen of the North’.5
After the death of king Jeroboam II, the nation of Israel had six different kings
in a period of twenty years. four of the kings were assassinated and two of
them were forcibly removed from the throne. The rising empire of Assyria
invaded Israel, and by 722 BC had completely conquered the nation and carried
off much of its population into exile. The nation of Israel made a mistake of
indenturing the Lord with Baal (master), a Canaanite nature God. “Canaanites
worshipped a pantheon of gods, but the most important in practice, though not
in theory the chief god was Baal”. By the time Hosea started prophesying, the
people of Israel were involved in idol worship, they were visiting shrine prostitutes,
adopting the magical practices of fertility cults.


Hosea 3:1

Chapter 3 is seen as one of the most
vital in the prophecy, but it is also one of the debatable. It presents some
insoluble problems and some phrases have dubious authenticity. Previously in
chapter 1 the lord has instructed Hosea ‘to go and marry a promiscuous woman,
and have children with her’ (1:1). The woman was called Gomer. Gomer means “perfection”, in Hebrew “gmr” meaning to “accomplish or compete”.6 But in
chapter 3:1 begins with Hosea been instructed, ‘again to go and show love your wife
again’ (3:1), The word “go again”
has different views among scholars, Anderson Mays sees it as a “divine command,
but Jacob Jeremias suggests that this interpretation best suits the word order
and puts the spotlight on the fact of Yahweh’s speaking, rather than on the
command itself”.7
The relationship between Gomer and the woman in Chapter 3 is questioned among
scholars that woman still Gomer. Fuhr suggest that ‘although not mentioned by
name, there is little doubt that the adulterous woman in 3:1 is Gomer’.8 He also
state that because ‘the event in chapter three appears in chapter one, seems
clear to demonstrate the love that God has for adulterous Israel, he conclude
by saying in this the drama unfolds to reveal that Gomer was in need of

The word “again” it suggested
that ‘it point to the second
marriage, not the remarriage of a divorced wife but the taking of a second wife’.10 This
view of Hosea having to marry a second wife has its another interpreting among
other scholars. They believe that ‘Hosea took two different women as wives to
represent the two kingdoms of Israel’.11 This
view is argued that there is no internal evidence that each supposed wife
represents the only half of Israel’.12 I
acknowledge all the view of the scholars but I believe that the woman Hosea was
commanded to marry is still the same woman.

 ‘The Hebrew word for “love” (bb) compose of
many meaning: to have sexual relations, to fall in love, to express a deep
emotional care and commitment, to make an alliance, here it must describe
Hosea’s acts and words that will back his wife’s affections’.13  so  Hosea was supposed to show this kind of love
to her woman, a love that has depth and emotional care for her as was commanded.
It is suggested that the command Hosea received, ‘would be difficult to obey
with a woman who had broken her lifetime commitment to her husband’.14 The
love that Hosea was going to show his wife was symbolic to God’s love to his
people (Israel), as Wiersbe hold that ‘God loved his people and wanted to
return that love to him, but they committed evil by worshipping idols, just
like a woman who is unfaithful to her husband’.15  

cakes of raisins” means “to compress”
or a noun denotes a cake prepared of “compressed
They are ‘delicacies distributed at times of celebration 2 Sam 6:19, they are
also used to worship of other gods like the queen of heaven according to Jer
7:18; 44:15-19’.17
 This to state that the Israelites ‘have
placed their affections on other gods, the have fallen in love with the cults
of their day which promise happiness and success’.18 Having
fallen to other gods the Israelite has violet the commandments, you shall not
have no other gods before me according to Exo 20:3′.19



Hosea is seen as an obedient servant
because he obeyed God’s commanded take his wife from another man. Redeeming his
wife was not easy, he was forced to pay redemption price to his wife’s lover to
release her. The redemption price was paid in both silver and grain were paid
in exchange. Thirty shekels was the price of a slave (Exod 21:32; Lev. 27:4). Barley was considered as bread of
the poor; it was also fed to animals’. The price paid can raise some questions
was Hosea poor? or he didn’t value his wife? Or the lover of his wife was a
poor man? Given that the full amount paid was not expensive, or did that man
value her? This redemption price is questioned, ‘why would Hosea need to make a
payment for someone who is already his wife’.20 It is
suggested that ‘possibly her practices of prostitution had forced her into
Teresa Hornsby also suggest that the price paid by Hosea is unstable at best
and cannot be used to identify the transaction as a purchase of a servant or
slave, but rather consider Hosea’s payment as one rendered to a prostitute for
her service’.22
 But view is was rejected by Rudolph based
on its theory, that Hosea is buying Gomer as a slave or servant on the basic
that the comparison between the value paid in Hosea to that of Leviticus and
Exodus is dubious, he claim that Hosea is buying a mistress’.23



After having redeemed Gomer back to his house Hosea lay
down some instructions, that she should remain fully in sexual self-discipline
form her husband until she is fully restored and recommits herself to him. Others
suggest that ‘the restrictions are acts of love designed to reform Gomer’.24 However
both Hosea and Gomer, will remain both faithful to each other. Gomer. The word
remains “dwell” stated here has same
verb describes the period of waiting for purification after childbirth. After
Gomer turns to him in loving commitment, she will again receive all the
blessings of full family privileges. The disciplinary period in their
marriage is described as ‘prophetic action designed to symbolize a time of
chastening and deprivation through which Israel is to pass’.25 “But
why should Hosea avoid his wife when he has just been told to love her?”26 The answer
is found in chapter …… ‘whereby Israel
will dwell many days without king, prince, without sacrifice or pillar without
ephod of household gods’ (v4). This restoration of Hosea and Gomer’
relationship is parallel to the story of God and Israelite’s relationship been



The disciplinary period Hosea gave to his wife is seen as
a ‘prophetic action designed to symbolize a time of chastening and deprivation
through which Israel is to pass’.27 Verse 4
interpret the purpose of verse 3. The couple will refrain from sex for a time,
this behavior too models the greater message of which a prophet and his wife
are a part so also Israel will live in isolation for a time without kings and
prince. These are ‘political leaders “kings
and princes” they performed some military role 7:16, also can be seen as ‘an
administrative official, not necessarily royal’ they will be removed because
they caused people to stumble’.28 The “scared stones”, ‘were stones erected at shrines to symbolize
the male deity, and they were often set beside lush trees or wooden posts,
which represented the female deity’.29 ‘They
were stand features at Canaanite Baal shrines, symbolizing the sexual fertility
of the deities, and they are vigorously condemned throughout the OT (Exo 23:24;
Deut 7:5; Lev 26:1; Hos 10:2; Amo 2:7-8; Mic 5:13)’.30

(priestly garment Ex 28; 39), ‘used in both legitimate Yahweh worship and pagan
cults’.31 They
also caused the Israelites to break their relationship with their God, so they
will be also removed. Gray smith state that ‘Yahweh will remove the factors
that have caused Israel to destroy her relationship with him’,32 as
stated in chapter 2 “for I will remove
the names of the Baals from your mouth, and they shall be remembered by name no
more” (2:17). “Idols” are statues of figurines representing
household deitites and could also be used for divination purposes (Zec 10;2;
Heb 2:19)33.
‘Since her exile, to varying degrees, Israel has lived without the full
implements of her national and religious systems’.34



 This verse begins
with “Afterwards”, which to state that at the end of disciple period that nation
of “Israel will seek their God” (v:5a). The word “seek” ascribe to the Israelites, ‘has a sense of seeking to gain
or regain a person or thing’, in other words it is ‘to attain something that is
that object of one’s desire’.35 McComiskey
state that ‘when one seek God, it is to make him the object of one’s allegiance
and desire’.36
 The one who will seek after the Lord
will has to turn to him and do his will, but ‘there is no indication of the
means which the God of Israelites will use to bring about this return’.37

“David their king” it is suggested this might applies to the
Davidic headship. But it is questioned that word david their king, might have
been latter addition. Fuhr argue that ‘Hosea is a true prophet, he is affirming
Davidic theology as some of the prophets as Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, a
theology based in the covenant God made in David (2 Sam 7:12-16)’.38 He also
suggests that the prophets were prophets and, as such, could predict the
future. Even if the primary function of the prophets was to proclaim the word
of God to their primary contemporaries this does not diminish their role to
proclaim the future as foretellers. Hosea does exactly that’.39 The
same promise for Israel’s return is similar to the promise stated in (1:11).

Vv:5c “fear God”, After return to
the Lord their God the nation will fear their God again. The word “fear God” means ‘either trembling in awe
or obeying’. Then in “the latter days” that’s to say a new convent in Christ,
as Douglas Stuart state that ‘the end time described have their ultimate
fulfillment in the new convent in Christ. Christ is David’s son who rules his
people as their head’.40 McComiskey
also suggest that this ‘does not always have an eschatological perspective. It
always denotes a period of time that, from the writer’s standpoint is in
indefinite future’.41



In conclusion, one will say that Hosea is faithful
servant who is willing to obey orders and break the law (of Torah) to fulfil
the plans of his God, as a prophet, he was not supposed to marry a prostitute
but because of his love and obedience to his God. The story teaches one to
understand the love of God he has for his people, even they turn back on him
but he still loves them. It is amazing that God is still reaching out to his
people even they are going after other gods. The cross demonstrates the love of
God, the redemption price paid by Hosea to his wife is seen in Jesus the price
he paid on the cross.


1 Gary V. Smith, The
Application commentary; From biblical text to contemporary life, (Michigan:
Zondervan, 2001), p.27

2 Richard Alan. Fuhr, Jr, and Gray E. Yates, The Message of the Twelve; Hearing the Voice
of the Minor Prophets (Tennessee: B Academic, 2016), p60

3 Robin Routledge, Old
Testament Introduction: Text, Interpretation structure, Themes, (Apollos: London, 2016), p310

4 Fuhr and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.60

5 Fuhr and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.60

6 Carol Meyers, Women
in scripture; A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, The
Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical books and the New Testament, (Michigan: Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing, 2000), p.84

7 David Allan Hubbard, Hosea An Introduction and Commentary, (Leicester: IVP, 90), p.90

8 Fuhr and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.71

9 Fuhr and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.71

10 Francis I. Andersen and David Noel Freedman, Hosea: A New Translation with Introduction
and Commentary, (New York: Doubleday and Company, 1983), p.295

11 Andersen and Hosea: A New Translation, p.304

12 Andersen and Hosea: A New Translation, p.304

13 Smith, The
Application commentary, p.74p.74

14 David R. Shepherd, Hosea/Obadiah:
Shepherd’s notes, when you need to guide through the Scriptures,
(Tennessee: Broadman & Holman Publishers), p.10

15 Warren. W. Wierbe, The
Wiersbe Bible Commentary Old Testament in One Volume, (Eastbourn: Kingway
Communication, 2007), p.1397

16 A. A. Macintosh, The
International Critical Commentary Hosea (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1997), p.95

James Limburg, Interpretation: A Bible
Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, Hosea – Micah, (Atlanta: John Knox
Press, 1988), p.13

Limburg, Hosea – Micah, p.15

19Limburg, Hosea – Micah, p.15

20 Smith, The Application commentary, p.2

21 Shepherd, Hosea/Obadiah,

22 Teresa J. Hornsby, ‘Israel has Become a Worthless Thing: Re-reading Gomer in Hosea 1-3’,
JSOT 82 (1999), pp.115-128 123

23 Hornsby, ‘Israel
has Become a Worthless Thing: pp.115-128 123

24 Smith, The Application
commentary, p.74

25 David Allan Hubbard, Hosea An Introduction and Commentary, (Leicester: IVP, 90), p.93

26 Andersen, Hosea: A New Translation, p.304

27 Hubbard, Hosea,

28 Andersen, Hosea:
A New Translation, p.306

Elizabeth Achtemeier, Mainor Prophets 1:
Understanding the Bible Commentary Series (Michigan: BakerBooks, 2012),

30 Achtemeier,
Mainor Prophets 1, p.32

31 Francis and Freedman, Hosea, p.306

32 Smith, The
Application commentary, p.75

Achtemeier, Manior Prophets 1, p.32

34 Fuhr and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.72

35 Thomas Edward McComiskey, An Exegetical and expository commentary; The Minor Prophets Hosea Joel
Amos, (Michigan: Baker Book House,
1998), p.54

36 McComiskey, An
Exegetical, p.54

37 Andersen and Hosea:
A New Translation, p.307

38 Fuhr and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.72

39 Fuhr, and Yates, The
Message of the Twelve, p.72

40 Douglas Stuart, Hosea-Jonah
Word Biblical Commentary, (Texas: Word Books Publisher, 1987), p.69

41 McComiskey, Hosea
Joel Amos, p.5