Instruction on Certain Aspects of Liberation Theology
Christ accords liberation to human beings from the domineering nature and force of sin due to their evil inclinations steeped within an individual since birth and this distorts their actions.
Sin constitutes and enforces a burden on the affected individual constituting to the desolation caused by lack of godliness within one’s life affecting identity and self-esteem that Christ restores.
All human beings bear the desire for justice majorly defined by the recognition and upholding of one’s dignity in maintaining self-dignity. The topic however, has been distorted overtime affecting its objectives.
The theme was initially introduced from nations located in Latin America whose religious precedence was Christianity. Secondary locations for the same doctrine were the developing nations that were also Christian.
The exodus from Egypt to Canaan serves as the fundamental aspect of liberation from alien authorities and slavery just like sin imparts within an individual’s life.
Liberty imparts God’s love within an individual, mainly evidenced by an altruistic nature to offer genuine support and offer consolation to the underprivileged within the society just as Christ did for sinners.
Marx’s premise against the doctrine of liberty is based on the economic aspects of effective resource allocations with regard to resource allocations. Being scientific in nature, it is an obsolete premise within a Christian doctrine.
Marx’s philosophy argues for class divisions with the low income earners serving the effluent. This weakens the liberal theme and accords violence as a resort for the effluent to achieve their endeavors through the poor.
Liberation theologians accord the view that both secular and salvation historical eras should be handled as one item as an imagery of the merging of God’s kingdom with the physical world.
The Hermeneutic view accords a significant role to the church with regard to conflict management and resolution; this view is regarded as obsolete to the liberalists.
Various schools of thought exist within the Church as evidenced in most issues yet the only personal guide one should use to determine the best view is the Biblical teaching of mercy and love for neighbors.
The Church opposes the liberty doctrine entirely due to the erroneous aspects within its principles, like the Marx’s position on class domination as it contradicts Christ’s teachings on liberty.
Instruction on Christian Freedom and Liberation
The chief condition is the acquisition of truth that is an embodiment of Christ as the true witness and liberator from the worldly problems embedded in sin.
Secular humanism founded on the amplification of the humanity over God; for instance technological advancements, personal achievements, and liberal philosophy among others that have limited the significance of Christ’s ministry in liberation.
It means that human reasoning should align itself to the revelations within the church for the impartation of divine guidance and knowledge. This accords a higher level of excellence within the affected processes.
The standpoint that only the scientific and economic academic disciplines, complemented by technological refinements hold viable solution to humanistic problems is erroneous and it enhances the burden on the underprivileged and young children.
Freedom is the practice of one’s desires devoid of external restraints. The church accords the spiritual view that aligns to God’s commands as the true freedom.
Man assumes a leadership position as he is accorded the role of ensuring that scientific and technological inventions enhance the human society with regard to ethics.
Dominion in nature as enforced through ethics should be based on ensuring that inventions enhance human relationships in a harmonious way that leads to societal growth.
Man tends towards slaving practices due to the refutation of his immortal and evil nature. With the realization of one’s vainness, freedom is easily acquired by allowing God to take his position.
It is encompassed by the exodus as the Israelites were accorded political, societal and economic domination in Egypt. Presently, the same process is accorded from sin to ultimate freedom in Christ.
The poor is a reflection of individuals who professed of their limited human nature to God with the recognition and application of his liberating power from their various oppressions.
The Israelites in the exodus were liberated into a place where they acquired their rest just as Christ liberates a sinner and leads them into God’s kingdom as citizens.
Liberation can only be achieved within a person that believes in their futile nature, as the reflection of poverty, and the response to God’s reaction to the issue of sin through Christ.
Christ-like love for both God and other individuals marks the new commandment and this can only be achieved through the impartation of the Holy Spirit’s fruit and nature in an individual.
Earthly progress is measured in terms of physical achievements while Kingdom progress is marked by spiritual progress. The distinction requirement is attributed to the fact that all shall be rewarded accordingly.
No because the Kingdom shall be founded on the virtue of justice as permanently instituted by Christ; therefore with Christians being a reflection of the same, they should accord the same example to the world.
Integral salvation is encompassed by a set of acceptable standards set by God in the Bible towards attaining salvation as the beatitudes amplify.
Christ was born in a poor family as imagery of the poverty that he took from humanity and substituted the same for riches. Christ also socialized with the poor as they evidenced the need and desire to be aided unlike the rich.
The church has a preference to the poor as a way of according help for the restoration of dignity to the underprivileged in the society as this enhances their self-worth.
It amplifies the position taken by Jesus that human life is far more significant in God’s perspective than material possessions as the former is eternal while the latter is temporal.
A liberalized man is freed from evil practices and tendencies and thereby accorded the ability to love other individuals as a practice of reciprocation of God’s love.
It is founded on the theme of Godly and neighbor love as the fundamental aspects of the institution of justice on societal problems.
The most basic principle remains as love as it enables humans in the recognition and encouragement of self-worth as a leeway of attaining freedom on both self and others.
Human needs are diverse in nature yet the preference is accorded to individuals in terms of dignity and spiritual welfare as opposed to structures like residential places.
The guidelines are based on the premise that any form of Church assistance cannot accord true liberation to an individual unless the need of freedom is first established.
The myth comprises of the erroneous argument that the elimination of a given problem acts as a sufficing role in the enhancement of a humane community, yet without a filling strategy the same leads to the establishment of dictatorial administrations.
Yes but it should be employed as a last resort. This struggle should be waged in passive manner altogether for the preservation of human life and thereby dignity.
The given roles are to be conducted by the laity so that pastors are enabled effectively to concentrate on their main functions of preaching within the Church.
Cultural conversion aligned to the Christian virtue of love as a means of according political, economic and societal issues in the world.
Solidarity emphasizes the aspect of individual contributions to the process of liberalization as evidenced by the ministry of Christ that still bears significance to the present world.
The eradication of illiteracy bears the highest significance as learning institutions comprise of diverse cultures that lead to enthusiasm for various cultural practices among the students.
The document enhanced the issue of democracy as a means of overcoming the problem of oppressive communism and liberalism within the society in the given period.
The initial notable thing regarded the provisions accorded to the workforce comprising of both males and females with the involvement of children. The other concerned equitable treatment between the affluent and the underprivileged towards welfare enhancement.
The period 1980s noted the socialist mode of authority within the regions of Latin America, Asia and Africa. In 1989 however, a notable significance was noted with the opposition and failure of the socialism within the same regions.
The most notable factor was the oppressive nature of the system to the workforce that led to the infringement of the employees’ rights. Economic inefficiencies too led to the same impact.
Private rights constitute to individual ownership that in nature is termed as conditional to the owner’s ability (resource ownership) while universal destination is encompassed by the fact that the earth was given to all humans as a means of attaining resources.
The market economy accords the same level of treatment to business dealers with regard to fair treatment and thereby according equity in the trade sphere as opposed to capitalism that is discriminative in nature.
Profit is an indicator of business welfare with regard to sustainability though it has to conform to ethical practices, for instance a trader cannot justify overcharging consumers for the purposes of enhanced profit margins.
Self-interest acts as the foundation for creativity within the business world as it encompasses the expression of one’s gifts and talents within a given subject.
The Pope does not support the given phenomenon since as it defines new consumer wants within the market it tends to ignore the spiritual implication of the same decisions.
The Pope accords concern on the ecology by noting that human beings deplete most natural resources in a careless manner that does not account for future trends and consequences of the same.
The term human ecology defines man’s role in the preservation of the environment for the sake of rest of the animal kingdom and in accordance to God’s instructions for the goodness of all earth dwellers.
Economic freedom can be both useful and destructive to humans depending on the implementation factor; when individuals manufacture products with the aim of consumption for survival, the issue becomes destructive.
Communism and capitalism bear a level of congruence in that both are detrimental to economies as they are tyrannical in nature and therefore leading to the decrease of consumer welfare.
Solidarity defines a selfless nature within a society from the family level and rising to the national level. Subsidiarity is the incorporation of trade tariffs towards the enhancement of economic welfare.
The democratic form of governance comprising of the three main branches acts as the soundest form of governance as it allows for a level of liberalism in idea presentation and upholding human dignity.
The welfare state holds human wellbeing at the core of its objectives with the need for poverty elimination as the main issues as it accords an adverse affect on human self-worth and thereby a good initiative.
The view is rejected as attributed to the fact that the government amplifies its position and importance above human life and needs such that every individual is expected to conform to the accorded rules or face retributions.
Democracy is favored due to the amount of dignity it accords to humans by allowing for collective expression and decisions. The reservation however concerns the practice of democracy that refrains from Godly standards.
An authentic democracy is that which accords the necessary attention to humans with regard to learning needs as these aids an individual with knowledge and consequently informed decisions.
The adoption of solidarity and the inclusion of welfare support to the needy as each lead to personal development and enhancement of other societal members dignity respectively.
It accords the involvement of all aspects of an individual as marked by the intellectual power, creativity in terms of talents or profession, and comprehension of the globe and other individuals.
The statement accords eminence to humans by the fact that Christ’s body and bride comprise of the church and thereby the need to accord proper care to the same in preparation for the future roles.
The sick and the unborn are still to be considered as human beings despite their conditions according to the Evangelium Vitae and this conforms to the Centesimus Annus in its nature that upholds the importance of human life and dignity.
The latest culture concerns the justification and legalization of offenses against human life preservation and as concerned with authentic democracy such individuals require the impartation of knowledge to overcome the current erroneous view.
The Bible accords a precise stand against abortion and as the Pope stands as an authority within the Catholic Church, according the same perspective towards the issue of abortion binds Catholics to the accorded decision.
The practice of euthanasia is also condemned by the Catholic Church as it accords slight worth to human life and with the document being pastoral in nature, it holds considerable authority over Catholics as the institution’s followers.
Ultimate freedom is only realized within a person with the mastering of one’s inclination to evil, with Cain having had the opportunity to tame his jealousy and resentment as directed by God.
The use of contraceptives is rejected within the Catholic doctrine since it acts as an anticipated form of preventing life formation, which in nature parallels the issue of abortion.