Theconcept of individual differences was developed in the second half of the 20thcentury,individualvalues and differences were recognized and welcomed .

A shift of attention  took place from long held preoccupation of physicalaspects of man, to  human being as atotality of physical, cognitive and affective variables . Following this shiftof attention, the way education is perceived and practiced has been affected..

Individualdifferences have beenthe center of any debate regarding learning and teaching. Also, research studies focused on   terms attempting to capture the  concepts that discern one  individual from another (Fontana, 1988;Lefrancios,1991; Crozier, 1997).                      A gradualChange of emphasis inlanguage methodology  from a teachercentred approach and teaching  towards  learner centred approach and  learning process (Lessard-Clouston, 1997).  At the same time, A considearable amount of attention   in second language acquisition research wasdirected from the products of language learning towards  the processes through which learning takesplace (Oxford, 1990)).As a  result of this change,   anincreasing interest  has been growing  to the concept of strategies, particularlylearning strategies and language learning strategies that derived  from information-processing model of cognitivepsychology has led  L2researchers  to shift  their focus to the role that strategies playin faciliting of L2 learning process.

   Languagelearning strategies (LLS) are defined as “specific actions taken by the learnerto make learning easier, faster, more enjoyable, more self directed , moreeffective, and more transferable to new situations” (Oxford,1990, p. 8). Learningstrategies are relevant  for both languagelearners  and teachers.They can lightenthe second language teachers burden as strategies consciousness can helplearners to organize and monitor their own learning process and assist  “shift the responsibility for learning offthe shoulders of the teachers onto those of the learners”(Cohen, 1998, p. 21).Learnerscan perform better by using certain strategies (O’Mally & Chamot, 1990).yetThe big question that still accompanies individual differences is whether they influencelanguage learning strategies ‘efficieny in foreignteaching and learning.

         In  a similar vein , growinginterest in L2 learning has been given to  another learner variable that  is intelligence. Till 1980s, among the researchstudies  that have been conducted toaddress individual differences in L2 learners , little research has been done onintelligence . As Akbari and Hosseini (2008) claim “if intelligence wasmentioned, it was, in the majority of cases to refute its existence and argue againstits importance” (pp. 142-143).           Intelligence wastraditionally  described in terms of asingle unique factor (i.e. general or g factor)that  takes merely the ,verbaland logical capacities of individuals into consideration This resulted infailing to count for language learners’ potentials for further growth.

Hence, inrecent decades, Gardner (1983, 1999) has developed a broader model/theory ofintelligence, labeled as Multiple Intelligence(s) (MI) which regards intelligence as a set  of abilities. Within this regard , Intelligenceis defined as “the ability to solve problems, or to create products, that arevalued within one or more cultural settings”(Gardner, 2011, p.28).  Armstrong (2009, p. 120) stated that applying multiple intelligence (MI) can beinfluential as it may remarkably “affect students’behavior in the classroomsimply by creating an environment where individual needs are recognized and attendedto throughout the school day.” The present study, thus, aims at investigatingthe relationship between multiple intelligence, language learning strategy useand achievement among MA first year English students at ISLT.1.3.

Rationale      With the emergence  of learner-centred theories about languageinstruction that wereprimarily concerned with the active involvement of the learner inlearning process and put a greater emphasis on the communicative needs of thelearner as an independent  individual (Johnson,1982; Breen, 2001; Savignon, 2002 Kumaravadivelu,2006). multiple intelligencetheory(MIT) was given a great deal of attention among  researchers giving credits  to its learner-centered philosophy and focus(Richards & Rodgers, 2001).Intelligenceis defined as the  “biopsychologicalpotential to process information that can be activated in a cultural setting tosolve problems”(Gardner, 1999, pp.

33–34). According to Brown (2007, p.119),  strategies are “specific methodsof approaching a problem or task, modes of operation for achieving a particularend, planned designs for controlling and manipulating certain information”. Ascan be noticed , both of these definitions deal with the concepts ofproblem-solving and individual differences. Second studies on individualdifferences have particularly concluded that individual differences are “consistentpredictors of L2 learning success” (Dörnyei, 2005, p. 6)           A large body of research probed  therelationship between multiple intelligence (MI) and variables related to foreignlanguage learning ( Christison, 1996; Haley, 2001, Smith, 2001; Arnold , 2004, Saricao?lu & Arikan,2009), learning strategies (Akbari , 2007), language proficiency (Razmjoo, 2008), reading comprehension(Hashemi, 2010), and listening proficiency (Naeini & Pandian, 2010).

Withregard to the Tunisian context, numerous studies investigated  learningstrategy use in relation to students’ achievement , performance and motivation.yet , few, if any, studies paid attention to the relationship between multipleintelligence and language learning strategies. Hence, The present study aims atfilling the gap in the existing literature .It is designed to investigate therelationship between multiple intelligence language learning strategy use  and achievement among MA first year Englishstudents


I'm Katy!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out