The Effects of Assisted Reproduction and Adoption on Parenting:Introduction:All across the global settings, infertility is being perceived as a disaster that leads to consequecnes in relation with society, economy and psychology also as reported by WHO (2010). The study of Steptoe and Edwards (1978), “Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs)” that covers intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in vitro mutation (IVM), “pre-implantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS)”, IVF including the use of other tools, which have been highly recognised and used clinically for for the infertility in humans, from the period when the first child was conceived through “in vitro fertilization (IVF)”. The technologies based on assisted reproduction are anticipated to be complemented with an escalation in concerns related with intellectual or mental growth for many different reasons. Initially, primary growth of the nervous system in human beings is very complicated, complex to comprehend and a precisely arranged procedure that could have possibly been influenced through intrusive intervention, as ARTs (Helmerhorst et al., 2004).

Secondly, a numerous number of risks related to many pregnancies are being brought to the ARTs attention that are directly linked with a high rate of “low birth weights” and prematurity while having, greater than before, admission in “neonatal intensive care” (de Graaf-Peters and Hadders-Algra, 2006). Afterwards, disorders related with reproduction, inclusive of “Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome”, “Angelman syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome” and “hyperthyrotropinemia” inclined to have frequent appearance or symptoms in human beings belong to the “ART group” as compared to the group of “Natural Conception (NC)” (Halliday et al., 2004 & Chang et al., 2005).

Preceding investigations tend to be based on a much smaller group of children, the groups are just comprised on the children who have been born through IVF or have considered to fulfil just a small segment of intellectual development or growth, as an instance “neurodevelopment”. As a matter of consequence, the purpose of this assignment is to provide an evaluation in regards to the impacts of adoption and assisted reproduction on the parenting, development of child, intellectual and emotional growth of children as well. Discussion:In the investigation by “Banerjee et al. (2008) and Golombok et al. (2001; 2002)” the parents associated with the ART have exhibited more constructive feelings or emotions, like affection and cordiality for their children, and shown less adverse emotions, such as violence and aggression towards their children, while being compared to the parents of children that have naturally conceived.

It has also been observed that such feelings were precisely and truly related to the mothers of the children (Barnes et al., 2004). In addition, the reports and reviews provided by Owen and Golombok in year 2009 and Golombok et al., in year 2002, presents a lower rate of discipline provided by the parents to their children in parents who associated with IVF in comparison to the ones associated with NC. Though, the children are being expected to maintain their own expectations along with the ones associated with them by others (Colpin and Soenen, 2002), more by the ART parents than the parents of children that have naturally conceived. When it comes to the interactibe behaviour of  parents and their children, healthier interactions or relations have observed in families associated with IVF whereas less “dysfunctional interactions in ICSI families” were observed (Ponjaert-Kristoffersen et al., 2004), in comparison to their “control group”.

While contrasting, none of the two reviews or investigations, (that are Golombok et al. (2009) & Gibson et al. (2000)) addressed that affection to the children and friendliness in the families associated with IVF different form each family as to those who have naturally conceived.

The relationship between the parents and children, the quality of life, or the different techniques of parenting in the families associated with ART have also been parallel to the families that naturally conceive. The exact description for the lack of dissimilarities or changes; for some couples, the natural conception is being planned and guided by professionals as assisted reproduction. In the meantime, “Assisted Reproduction Technique” has turned out to be an extensively utilised and appreciated technique of reproduction.

The relationship amongst the parents and children is being deliberated as the primary ground for the growth of values based on society and ethics within the child, along with the progression of abilities and language. Large quantities of information and evidences have recommended that the parents associated with ART, especially the mothers, represented positive attitudes of parenting and show comparatively more protection to their own children in the course of their growth. In the year 1999, Duncan and Edwards determined that the mothers associated with ICSI, not fathers, were observed to be more dedicated and inspired to being a mother than those mothers of children who have naturally conceived that representation describes the performance of mothers. Besides that, studies regarding with the concerns on psychological or mental effect of ART endorsed that initially the incapacity to conceive children was practiced as a traumatic state by the couples and individuals themselves.

Whereas, secondly, the parents or couples who conceive utilising “Assisted Reproduction Technology” acknowledged with extra anxiety and stress within the assisted reproduction process (Cousineau and Domar, 2007). The possibility to affect and slightly enhance or change the role of parents is present under both conditions, while influencing how parents may think in regards to their children which afterwards influences the relationship amongst children and parents along with the growth of children (both physical and intellectual). Lower levels of parenting stress and anxiety are being reported by the mothers of children who have born through the technique of “assisted reproduction” (Golombok et al., 1995, 1996), in comparison to the mothers of children who have naturally conceived. In year 1996, the review presented by Golombok et al. identifies no particular dissimilarity in fathers regarding the parenting anxiety and stress. Meanwhile, greater “emotional involvement” has been observed in the mothers of children that are born through assisted reproduction with their children than ‘normal’ mothers. In the extents of France, a “longitudinal study” was conducted by “Raoul-Duval et al.

” in year 1994, investigating the different attitudes of mothers towards their children from the time of “birth to the third year of development”. In accordance with the uniformity, “socioeconomic status”, age of mother and the number of babies, every “IVF mother-infant pair” was corresponded with two regulatory groups. These regulatory groups were purely based on the mothers having a history of infertility (gave birth after the induction of ovary) while the other group is based on the mothers that have naturally conceived. Such “mother-infant pairs” were observed and notes were taken in the clinic after birth, then after the period of nine, eighteen and thirty-six months at home respectively. Reflection and evidences of the relationship among the mother and infant was assessed on the grounds of methods where the mother being addressed to her baby especially with the intention to “breastfeed the baby”.

In the particular time span of three years, no particular dissimilarity was identified among the groups. The relationships amongst the parents and children were being assessed in families having single born and 2 to 2.5 years old children being “conceived by IVF” and in the “control families with naturally conceived children”, in the extents of Belgium by Colpin et al.

(1995). The social evaluation inclusive of the interpretations of interactions amongst mother and child in a range of four tasks based on problem-solving. Throughout such tasks, the children were being rated on the basis of 07 scales; “enthusiasm, persistence in the task, reliance on mother for help, compliance by mother, avoidance of the mother, hostility, and the expression of positive feelings toward the mother”. In accordance with the “Rating Scales for Structured Tasks”, no significant differences or dissimilarities were identified amongst the groups for the interaction of parent and child. It was being suggested by the socio-emotional growth of “preschool and early-school-age children” that have conceived through ART that no precise dissimilarity in terms of statistics is present while contrasted to either the adoptive or the naturally conceived children.

“The Child Behaviour Checklist” was being utilised in Australia by “Kovacs, Mushin, Kane, and Baker in year 1993”, in order to make comparison of the children who were born through DI to “adoptees” and the children that are naturally conceived. The selected group of children were age among six and eight years. Precise dissimilarities were not being identified for the children that have been conceived through “DI on the CBCL” while contrasted to the regulations. Investigations regarding the phenomenon of adoption has presented that five years is the minimum age at which children commence to precisely distinguish among the term of “birth and adoption” by means of substitute manners of being a part of family and initiated to understand the significance and consequences of being adopted, as precisely mentioned in year 2002 by Brodzinsky & Pinderhughes. In accordance with the study of Chan et al. in the year 2002, another review of adjustment of children in the families associated with assisted reproduction and parenting, dominantly observed families based on single mothers and lesbians with the “seven-year-old children” born through donor fertilisation or reproduction while identified that the children were functioning effectively. Legal Perspective:If adoption of a child is decided, or having baby by means of “assisted reproductive technology” or “surrogate motherhood”, the couple are required to have an order from law court in order to endorse their legal positions as the parent of children to therefore legally be parents of the child.

There is a possibility that the legal order might be an order of adoption or a simple “declaration of parentage”. Relying on the situations, just being recognised as the co-parent or parent on the “birth certificate” of children may will not be sufficient to some but may be sufficient to others. In some conditions, strangely, this type of risk can appear though the couple is the genetic parent of their children. A legal order from the law court is significant not only to authorise the position as parents, though to give assurance and confidence that the remaining individuals who contributed in the procedure of birth of your child, just like the donor of sperm, do not have the right to step forward and make any claim or accusation for that position. The principles are quite distinct in different regions all around the globe, and are supposed to vary from one another. In the premises of “British Columbia”, new laws are in progress that will highlight the reality of reproductive material available and what is being donated by someone may not be sufficient to make that individual a parent of the baby resulted from that contribution.

Just the mother who gave birth and the common-law or married spouse of that mother who gave birth will be deliberated as the parents, except that the parties has also agreed on the involvement by means of a written contract, prior to the conception of child. Conclusion:Through utilising the technology based on assisted reproduction, making families has initiated several of issues regarding the hypothetically negative conclusions for the development and growth of child. Though it appears from the available evidences at yet, that these issues have not identified. No indications have observed regarding intellectual disability in the single born children in the consequence of “IVF processes”, though the conclusions in relation with the “ICSI children” are still questionable. Regarding with the progression based on the “socio-emotional” factors, the children conceived through “assisted reproduction” observed to be operating the activities effectively. The extensive problems infants of IVF are grounded on the “maternal reports” and possibly result from the greater levels of anxiety and stress in the mothers associated with IVF. Investigations based on children in the “pre-school years” do not signify a higher frequency or concerns related with attitude in between the “assisted reproduction children”. A large proportion of children conceived through the donation of gamete developed being unaware regarding the lack of their hereditary relation either with one or both of their parents.

Though the lack of cognitive or mental issues in the children conceived through the donation of gamete recommends that confidentiality or concealment does not really have negative impact, this does not indicate that it is good for the child, of being unaware regarding the “nature of their conception”. One of the most challenging issues in relation to the experience of “assisted reproduction” is the numerous “multiple births”. The threats regarded with the “multiple births” in the form of “perinatal mortality, neonatal problems, physical incapacity, and mental injury” have been identified and improvement is headed its way. References:Zhan, Q.

T., Pan, P. P., Xu, X. R., Lou, H. Y., Lou, Y.

Y., & Jin, F. (2013).

An overview of studies on psychological well-being in children born following assisted reproductive technologies. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 14(11), 947-960.Steptoe P, Edwards R.

Birth after the re-implantation of a human embryo. Lancet. Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O.

, Mansour, R., Nygren, K., … & Van der Poel, S. (2009). The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009.

 Human reproduction, 24(11), 2683-2687.Hahn, C. S. (2001). Psychosocial well-being of parents and their children born after assisted reproduction. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26(8), 525-538.Hill, J.

L. (1991). What Does it Mean to be a Parent–The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights. NYUL Rev., 66, 353.

Golombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P.

, Mellish, L., Marks, A., & Jadva, V. (2011). Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 230.

World Health Organization. Infertility. 2010.

Sept. 5, 2010. Available from


I'm Katy!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out