Various project. 3.1. Object classification Classification is an

Various data mining
algorithms are used by astronomers in most of the applications in astronomy.
However, studies and several projects have also been made by data mining experts
utilizing astronomical data because astronomy has produced many large datasets
that are flexible to the approach along with other fields such as medicine and
high energy physics. Examples of such projects are the SKICAT-Sky Image
Cataloging and Analysis System for catalog production and catalog analysis from
digitized sky surveys particularly the scans of the second Palomar Observatory
Sky Survey; the JAR Tool- Jet Propulsion Laboratory Adaptive Recognition Tool
used for recognition of volcanoes in the over 30,000 images of Venus returned
by the Magellan mission; the subsequent and more general Diamond Eye and the
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Sapphire project.

 

3.1. Object classification

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Classification is an
important preliminary step in the scientific process as it provides a method
for organizing information in a way that can be used to make hypotheses and compare
with models. The two useful concepts in object classification are the completeness and
the efficiency, also known as recall and precision. They are
defined in terms of true and false positives (TP and FP) and true and false
negatives (TN and FN). The completeness is the fraction of objects that are
truly of a given type that are classified as that type:

and the efficiency is the
fraction of objects classified as a given type that are truly of that type

These two quantities are
interesting astrophysically because, while one wants both higher completeness
and efficiency, there is generally a tradeoff involved. The importance of each
often depends on the application, for example, an investigation of rare objects
generally requires high completeness while allowing some contamination (lower
efficiency), but statistical clustering of cosmological objects requires high
efficiency, even at the expense of completeness.

3.1.1. Star-Galaxy
Separation

Due to their small
physical size in comparison to their distance from us, almost all stars are
unresolved in photometric datasets, and thus appear as point sources. Galaxies,
however, despite being further away, generally subtend a larger angle, and thus
appear as extended sources. However, other astrophysical objects such as
quasars and supernovae, also appear as point sources. Thus, the separation of
photometric catalogs into stars and galaxies, or more generally, stars,
galaxies, and other objects, is an important problem. The sheer number of
galaxies and stars in typical surveys (of order 108 or above)
requires that such separation be automated.

This problem is a well
studied one and automated approaches were employed even before current data
mining algorithms became popular, for example, during digitization by the
scanning of photographic plates by machines such as the APM and DPOSS.Several
data mining algorithms have been employed, including ANN,DT,mixture modeling,
and SOM,with most algorithms achieving over 95% efficiency. Typically, this is
done using a set of measured morphological parameters that are derived from the
survey photometry, with perhaps colors or other information, such as the
seeing, as a prior. The advantage of this data mining approach is that all such
information about each object is easily incorporated.

3.1.2. Galaxy
Morphology

Galaxies come in a range
of different sizes and shapes, or more collectively, morphology. The most
well-known system for the morphological classification of galaxies is the
Hubble Sequence of elliptical, spiral, barred spiral, and irregular, along with
various subclasses. This system correlates to many physical properties known to
be important in the formation and evolution of galaxies.

Because galaxy morphology is a complex phenomenon that correlates
to the underlying physics, but is not unique to any one given process, the
Hubble sequence has endured, despite it being rather subjective and based on
visible-light morphology originally derived from blue-biased photographic
plates. The Hubble sequence has been extended in various ways, and for data
mining purposes the T system  has been extensively used.
This system maps the categorical Hubble types E, S0, Sa, Sb, Sc, Sd, and Irr
onto the numerical values -5 to 10.

One can, therefore, train
a supervised algorithm to assign T types to images for which measured
parameters are available. Such parameters can be purely morphological, or
include other information such as color. A series of papers by Lahav and
collaborators do exactly this, by applying ANNs to predict the T type of
galaxies at low redshift, and finding equal accuracy to human experts. ANNs
have also been applied to higher redshift data to distinguish between normal
and peculiar galaxies and the fundamentally topological and unsupervised SOM
ANN has been used to classify galaxies from Hubble Space Telescope images,
where the initial distribution of classes is not known. Likewise, ANNs have
been used to obtain morphological types from galaxy spectra.

3.2.
Photometric redshifts

An area of astrophysics
that has greatly increased in popularity in the last few years is the
estimation of redshifts from photometric data (photo-zs). This is
because, although the distances are less accurate than those obtained with
spectra, the sheer number of objects with photometric measurements can often
make up for the reduction in individual accuracy by suppressing the statistical
noise of an ensemble calculation.

The two common approaches
to photo-zs are the template method and the empirical training set
method. The template approach has many complicating issues, including
calibration, zero-points, priors, multiwavelength performance (e.g., poor in
the mid-infrared), and difficulty handling missing or incomplete training data.
We focus in this review on the empirical approach, as it is an implementation
of supervised learning.

3.2.1. Galaxies

At low redshifts, the calculation of photometric redshifts for
normal galaxies is quite straightforward due to the break in the typical galaxy
spectrum at 4000A. Thus, as a galaxy is redshifted with increasing distance,
the color (measured as a difference in magnitudes) changes relatively smoothly.
As a result, both template and empirical photo-z approaches obtain
similar results, a root-mean-square deviation of ~ 0.02 in redshift, which is
close to the best possible result given the intrinsic spread in the properties.
This has been shown with ANNs SVM DT, kNN, empirical polynomial
relations, numerous template-based studies, and several other methods. At
higher redshifts, obtaining accurate results becomes more difficult because the
4000A break is shifted redward of the optical, galaxies are fainter and thus
spectral data are sparser, and galaxies intrinsically evolve over time. While
supervised learning has been successfully used, beyond the spectral regime the
obvious limitation arises that in order to reach the limiting magnitude of the
photometric portions of surveys, extrapolation would be required. In this regime,
or where only small training sets are available, template-based results can be
used, but without spectral information, the templates themselves are being
extrapolated. However, the extrapolation of the templates is being done in a
more physically motivated manner. It is likely that the more general hybrid
approach of using empirical data to iteratively improve the templates or the
semi-supervised method described in will ultimately provide a more elegant
solution. Another issue at higher redshift is that the available numbers of
objects can become quite small (in the hundreds or fewer), thus reintroducing
the curse of dimensionality by a simple lack of objects compared to measured
wavebands. The methods of dimension reduction can help to mitigate this effect.